Decolonization Abandonment

De-colonization began with the British colonists in the United States
who declared independence in 1776. Most of Latin America gained
independence a few decades later. De-colonization continued through the
mid-1970s, mostly in Asia and Africa, until almost no European colonies
remained. Most of the newly independent states have faced tremendous
challenges and difficulties in the post-colonial era. The stability and
harmony of de-colonized countries are not guaranteed once the countries
are left to the hands of indigenous people.
Colonies were flourishing under the colonial administrative
government which creates bureaucratic, legislative and educative filters
that guarantees indigenous interest. Through law, politics, policy and
culture brought by colonizers, the indigenous reproduce themselves while
legitimizing and rectifying their origins. Along with an adequate and
appropriate government system, both colonial and indigenous realities can
contribute to the future shape and nature of the nation state.
Economic investment by the administrating power directly benefits
the inhabitants of a given region (Guarini n.p.). Suitable structures in the
field of credit and savings have been set up successfully in colonies and
this has managed to organize and support the production of goods
necessary to the economic equilibrium of the region. By meeting the
demands of the people, a higher standard of living is achieved.
All citizens benefit from security arrangements when the territories
host colonial security forces (Plunkett n.p.). It is guaranteed that the
colony will be protected by the armed forces available if there ever is a
case of war. This is possible as every state has a right and obligation to
defend its colonies (Cunningham n.p.). The people of a majority of the
territories no longer view, if they ever did, the activities of foreign
economic interest or the presence of military installations on their territory
as detrimental to their interest (Minton n.p.).

Colonization powers help to promote economic development and
social progress that facilitates economic and financial cooperation at an
international level (Loi-Cadre n.p.). For example, the French Government
had carried out reforms and taken measures to ensure the development of
the territories under its jurisdiction. Modern methods of rural development
were inaugurated and cadastral plans were established in which the
customary rights of the autochthones were respected. Most importantly,
education was generalized and standardized.
De-colonization causes the people to build a nation with no
background on how to govern a nation and this may lead to many political
differences. Many countries face the threat of rushing it. Once the
thought of a sovereign country catches on as one of the foremost
political issues of the day, many will demand immediate action, with belief
that reflection and introspection are not worth the time and effort in the
development of a new social order.
Colonization powers make all useful arrangements to ensure on a
permanent basis, that there is a coordination of economic and financial
matters (Petersen n.p.). Raising the consciousness of indigenous people
that the state in which they live in is the best and most effective way
towards achieving sustainable development in the country (Green n.p.). A
successful strategy is to expose the people to the positive contribution
brought into the country by colonizers. The role and powers of
administration and management of the general government can be
modified to facilitate the access of native born civil servants. This
provides experiences that instill a sense of purpose by involving the
people and would help eliminate doubt in the colonizers capability in
If indigenous people had not undergone the influence of
colonialism, they would not the exact same societies as those that existed
at the time of initial contact. It is at this point that the indigenous person
must learn to exist within a colonial environment in a de-colonized
manner. Thus, it would be a fallacy to believe that colonized people is
capable to lead the country by utilizing traditional philosophies and
practices after de-colonization (Guarini n.p.). It would not be suitable and
may cause differences and conflicts pertaining to how the country should
Colonies should be put through a process of de-colonization
whereby the nation is de-colonized in stages, which would enable the
people to govern their own nation effectively and efficiently. It is during
this phase where people colonized are able to explore their own
aspirations for their future, consider their own structures of government
and social order, which encompass and expresses their hopes. So crucial
is this process that it must be allowed to run its full course. If it is cut short
by any action plan or program designed to create a remedy meeting the
perception of de-colonization at a premature stage, the result can prove
I liken this process to the formation of a fetus in a mothers womb. That
fetus must be allowed its time to develop and grow to its full potential.
To attempt to rush the process, bringing baby out earlier than its
natural time, could prove dangerous if not disastrous. (Laenui n.p.)
Given the vast variety of people, places and political circumstances,
it is not believed that a single standard of de-colonization applies to every
territory (Minton n.p.). There are many instances in which people who
underwent “de-colonization” merely underwent a change in position of the
colonizer. For example, the constitutions of the newly emerged Pacific
island nations as well as African nations. Do they reflect more closely the
social and legal culture of the immediate preceding colonizer, which only
works when the countries were under colonial rule? Are those documents
truly reflective of the hopes and aspirations of the people previously
True de-colonization is more than simply replacing indigenous or
previously colonized people into the positions held by colonizers. De-
colonization includes the reevaluation of the political, social, economic and
judicial structures themselves, and the development, if appropriate, of new
structures, which can hold and house the values and aspirations of the
colonized people (Loi-Cadre n.p.). Methods and processes by which
indigenous concerns and contributions can be incorporated into the overall
study of the countrys sovereignty to ensure the continuing stability of the
The people must be freely chosen through informed elections by
the people to instill the spirit of cooperation, flexibility and goodwill
(Minton n.p.). They should have the opportunity to weigh the voices rather
than be forced to be under a government that might have very short-
sighted goals, measured generally by materialistic gains. They will be
able to wade through the cult of personalities, family histories, and release
themselves from colonial patriotism. They will now be ready for
commitment to a single direction in which the society will move. This
phase will culminate in people combining their voices in a clear statement
of their desired direction. Over time, the commitment will become so clear
that a formal process merely becomes a pro forma expression of the
It is very crucial for both the colonizers and the people colonized to
confirm what each gets from de-colonization and what changes it would
bring to both parties. This brings to light the burden of colonized countries
have to bear in order to achieve the status of independence.
De-colonization would only be inviting political and economic
consequences, which the country may do better without.
Bibliography:

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now